Skip to main content
CalcMax

Rule of 72 Calculator

Range: 0.10 – 50

Result

9.00

Years to double, rule of 72

Years to double, exact
9.006
Rule of 72 error
-0.006
Actual multiple after the rule's years
1.9990

The rule of 72 is a shortcut for how long money takes to double: divide 72 by the annual rate and that is the number of years. It is genuinely useful and it is genuinely approximate, and this page prints both halves of that sentence. The first output is what the rule says. The second is the exact answer, which comes from solving the compound interest equation for time rather than from dividing anything, and the third is the difference between them. That difference is the interesting number, because its sign changes. At one percent a year the rule says 72 years while the exact answer is 69.661, so the shortcut overstates the wait by more than two years. At twenty percent the rule says 3.60 years while the exact answer is 3.802, so it understates the wait. Somewhere between seven and eight percent the two cross and the rule is almost exactly right, which is why eight percent is this page's default and why the table below includes both seven and eight rather than picking one. The fourth output reframes the same error in money instead of time: it grows a balance at your rate for exactly as many years as the rule told you to wait, and reports what you actually end up with. At eight percent that is 1.9990 times your money rather than 2, and at twenty percent it is only 1.9278 times. This page does not attempt to explain where the number 72 comes from — that is a question about history and convention, and the useful thing here is the arithmetic you can check.

Nine rates from 1% to 20%: the rule, the exact answer, and the gap between them

Rate (%)Rule of 72 (years)Exact (years)Error (years)Multiple at the rule's answer
17269.6612.3392.0471
23635.0030.9972.0399
514.414.2070.1932.019
710.2910.2450.0412.0055
899.006-0.0061.999
107.27.273-0.0731.9862
1266.116-0.1161.9738
154.84.959-0.1591.9559
203.63.802-0.2021.9278

Read the error column from top to bottom and watch it change sign, because that is the whole point of the table. At one percent the rule is 2.339 years too long; the gap shrinks steadily as the rate rises and passes through seven percent, where it is still barely positive at 0.041, and eight percent, where it has just turned negative at 0.006. That is why both rows are here: a table that skipped from five to ten percent would show a column that only ever gets more negative and would hide the fact that the shortcut is at its best in the middle. Below the crossing the multiple column runs above 2, meaning the rule made you wait longer than you needed to; above it the multiple drops below 2 and keeps falling, and by twenty percent the shortcut leaves you with 1.9278 times your money instead of 2.

Formula

Rule of 72: years to double ≈ 72 ÷ annual rate; exact: years = ln(2) ÷ ln(1 + annual rate ÷ 100)

Annual rate
The yearly rate as a percentage — 8 means eight percent — which must be above zero because both expressions divide by something that vanishes there
72
The numerator of the shortcut, chosen so that the division is easy to do in your head at the rates people meet most often
ln(2)
The natural logarithm of two, about 0.6931, which appears because doubling means solving (1 + r) raised to the power n equals 2
Years to double
How long the money takes to double at a rate that is compounded; the shortcut and the exact answer are quoted side by side
Error
The shortcut's answer minus the exact one, which is positive at low rates and negative at high ones
Multiple at the rule's answer
What your money actually becomes if you wait exactly as long as the shortcut told you to, which is slightly under two at almost every rate

Use the shortcut when you need an answer in your head during a conversation, and use the exact figure when the answer is going to be written down. Because the two agree closely in the range where most ordinary rates live, the shortcut is at its best for rough planning at five to ten percent, and it is at its worst at both extremes: below about three percent it overstates the wait badly, and above about fifteen percent it understates it. The multiple output answers the question the error figure raises but does not settle, which is whether being off by a fifth of a year actually costs you anything. At twenty percent, waiting the rule's 3.6 years instead of the exact 3.802 leaves you with 1.93 times your money instead of 2 — a shortfall of about seven percent of your gain, which is worth knowing before you use the shortcut on a high rate.

Worked examples

  1. Eight percent: the rate where the rule is nearly exact

    1. The rule: 72 ÷ 8 = 9.00 years
    2. The exact answer: ln(2) ÷ ln(1.08) = 0.693147 ÷ 0.076961 = 9.006 years
    3. Error: 9.00 − 9.006 = −0.006 years, about two days
    4. Growing at 8% for exactly 9 years: 1.08⁹ = 1.9990

    This is the page's default because it is the rule's best case, and it is worth seeing how good the best case is: the shortcut is off by about two days out of nine years. The multiple output is the tell that even here it is not exact — nine years at eight percent compounded gives you 1.9990 times your money, not 2, and it takes another couple of days to close that last thousandth.

  2. One percent: the rule overstates the wait by more than two years

    1. The rule: 72 ÷ 1 = 72.00 years
    2. The exact answer: ln(2) ÷ ln(1.01) = 0.693147 ÷ 0.009950 = 69.661 years
    3. Error: 72.00 − 69.661 = +2.339 years
    4. Growing at 1% for 72 years: 1.01⁷² = 2.0471

    At a savings-account rate the shortcut is generous about how long you wait, and the direction is the opposite of what most people assume. The multiple makes it concrete: waiting the rule's 72 years at one percent leaves you with 2.0471 times your money rather than 2, so the extra two and a bit years are not wasted, they just overshoot. This is the largest error in the table.

  3. Twenty percent: the rule now understates the wait

    1. The rule: 72 ÷ 20 = 3.60 years
    2. The exact answer: ln(2) ÷ ln(1.2) = 0.693147 ÷ 0.182322 = 3.802 years
    3. Error: 3.60 − 3.802 = −0.202 years
    4. Growing at 20% for 3.6 years: 1.2^3.6 = 1.9278

    Compare this with the one percent case and the point of the page is visible: the error has changed sign. The rule now promises a doubling a fifth of a year too early, and if you rely on it you get 1.9278 times your money instead of 2 — about seven percent of the gain you were expecting. The two cases are deliberately far apart in rate and close together in the size of the error in years, which is why the error in years is a poor guide on its own and the multiple is printed beside it.

Limitations

The rule of 72 is an approximation and this page does not pretend otherwise; what it does is tell you how large the approximation is at your rate. It assumes the rate is compounded, and that it stays the same for the whole period — a rate that changes partway through has no single doubling time, and the rule has no way to express one. It works on a rate above zero only, because both the division and the logarithm fail at zero, which is why the field will not accept a rate below a tenth of a percent. It says nothing about tax or inflation, so the doubling time it reports is in nominal money: at three percent inflation a balance doubling in twenty-four years has not doubled in what it can buy. And it describes a single lump sum that is left alone, so it does not apply to a series of deposits, where the arithmetic is a different one and the answer is shorter. Finally, the shortcut is a rule about the number 72, not about your investment — the exact answer is the one to use when the figure matters, and the shortcut is the one to use when you are talking.

Frequently asked questions

How does the rule of 72 work?
Divide 72 by the annual rate and the result is roughly how many years it takes the money to double. At eight percent that is 9.00 years and the exact answer is 9.006 years, so the shortcut is nearly perfect; at one percent it says 72 years when the exact answer is 69.661, and at twenty percent it says 3.60 when the exact answer is 3.802. The shortcut is a mental-arithmetic tool and this page shows the exact doubling time next to it.
Why is the rule of 72 only approximate?
Because it replaces a logarithm with a division. The exact doubling time solves the compound interest equation for the number of periods, which gives the natural logarithm of two divided by the logarithm of one plus the rate. The shortcut uses a fixed numerator instead, and the fixed numerator is a good match only over a range of rates: the two answers cross somewhere between seven and eight percent and drift apart in opposite directions on either side of that crossing.
Which way does the rule of 72 err?
Both ways, depending on the rate, and that is the part most people do not expect. Below the crossing point the shortcut gives an answer that is too long: at one percent it says 72 years against an exact 69.661, overstating the wait by more than two years. Above it the shortcut gives an answer that is too short: at twenty percent it says 3.60 against an exact 3.802. The sign of the error changes between seven percent, where it is still positive, and eight percent, where it has turned negative.
What does the multiple at the rule's answer mean?
It is what your money actually becomes if you wait exactly as long as the shortcut told you to. Growing a balance at eight percent for 9 years gives 1.9990 times your money rather than the 2 the rule implies, and at twenty percent, waiting the rule's 3.60 years gives only 1.9278 times. It converts the error from years into money, which is the form in which the error actually costs you something.
Can I use the rule of 72 with a low rate?
You can, but the error grows quickly as the rate falls, and it grows in the direction of overstating the wait. At one percent the shortcut says 72 years while the exact doubling time is 69.661, a gap of more than two years, and a balance grown at one percent for 72 years ends up at 2.0471 times its starting value. The field will not accept a rate at or below zero at all, because both the division and the logarithm break there.
Does the rule of 72 account for inflation or tax?
No, and neither does the exact figure on this page. Both work on the rate you type, so if that rate is a nominal return the doubling time is in nominal money, and a balance that doubles in nominal terms over twenty-four years at three percent inflation has not doubled in purchasing power. The same applies to tax: a return taxed along the way compounds at a lower effective rate, and the doubling time for the after-tax rate is longer than the one shown here.

References

Related calculators