Skip to main content
CalcMax

Ideal Weight Calculator

Range: 120 cm – 250 cm

Result

70.5 kg

Ideal weight (Devine)

Ideal weight (Robinson)
68.9 kg
Ideal weight (Miller)
68.7 kg
Healthy weight, low end
56.7 kg
Healthy weight, high end
76.6 kg

An ideal weight calculator answers a question your bathroom scale cannot: given your height and sex, what weight should you be aiming for? This one reports three formulas — Devine, Robinson and Miller — and next to them the healthy weight range derived from BMI. The three disagree by a kilogram or two, and that spread is the honest part of the answer: none of them is a health target. All three were derived for drug dosing, where the point is to scale a dose to body size, not to set a goal. Use the BMI range for health, and the formulas for what they were built for.

Ideal body weight for men, by height

Height (cm)Devine (kg)Robinson (kg)Miller (kg)
15552.453.957.6
16056.957.760.4
16561.461.463.2
17065.965.266
17570.568.968.7
1807572.671.5
18579.576.474.3
1908480.177.1

All three formulas are linear above five feet, so each column rises by a fixed number of kilograms per inch of height. Values are rounded to one decimal place.

Ideal body weight for women, by height

Height (cm)Devine (kg)Robinson (kg)Miller (kg)
15547.950.754.5
16052.454.157.2
16556.957.459.8
17061.460.862.5
1756664.165.2
18070.567.567.9
1857570.870.6
19079.574.273.2

Compare with the men's table: Devine sits exactly 4.5 kg lower at every height, while Robinson and Miller start closer and pull further apart as height increases.

Formula

ideal body weight = base weight + (height in inches − 60) × kilograms per inch

height
Height above 5 feet (60 inches), in inches (in)
base weight
Weight at exactly 5 feet: 50.0 kg for men and 45.5 kg for women on Devine; 52.0 / 49.0 on Robinson; 56.2 / 53.1 on Miller (kg)
kilograms per inch
Slope of the line: 2.3 for both sexes on Devine, 1.9 for men and 1.7 for women on Robinson, 1.41 and 1.36 on Miller (kg)

Use the Devine formula when you need a single number to scale a drug dose, which is what all three were fitted for; Devine is the one most dosing references print. For a health target, read the healthy weight range instead — that range is the one public health bodies publish. The two height and weight tables below print every value the formulas produce, so you can check a number without typing it in.

Worked examples

  1. A man 175 cm tall

    1. Convert to inches: 175 ÷ 2.54 = 68.9 inches
    2. Subtract the 60-inch base: 68.9 − 60 = 8.9 inches above 5 feet
    3. Devine: 50.0 + 8.9 × 2.3 = 70.5 kg
    4. Robinson: 52.0 + 8.9 × 1.9 = 68.9 kg
    5. Miller: 56.2 + 8.9 × 1.41 = 68.7 kg

    The three answers span 1.8 kg. That spread, not any single number, is what these formulas actually tell you.

  2. A woman 163 cm tall

    1. 163 ÷ 2.54 = 64.2 inches, so 4.2 inches above the base
    2. Devine: 45.5 + 4.2 × 2.3 = 55.1 kg
    3. Robinson: 49.0 + 4.2 × 1.7 = 56.1 kg
    4. Miller: 53.1 + 4.2 × 1.36 = 58.8 kg

    Devine starts 4.5 kg lower for women and keeps the same slope, so that gap never changes. Robinson and Miller start lower too, but with shallower slopes — their gap widens as height increases.

  3. A man exactly 152.4 cm tall

    1. 152.4 cm is exactly 60 inches — five feet
    2. The per-inch term is zero, so each formula returns its base weight
    3. Devine 50.0 kg, Robinson 52.0 kg, Miller 56.2 kg

    At exactly five feet the slope drops out. Below it the calculator holds these values rather than extrapolating downward.

Limitations

The three formulas were derived for drug dosing, not for health, and none of them accounts for frame size, muscle mass or age: a 175 cm athlete and a 175 cm sedentary adult get the same answer. Devine was fitted to a small 1974 sample and has never been validated against measured body composition. Robinson and Miller regress on Metropolitan Life tables, which were insured-population averages, and the published coefficients are rounded differently by different sources. Below five feet (152.4 cm) the formulas would extrapolate downward into the underweight BMI range, so the calculator holds the five-foot value instead. No result here applies during pregnancy.

Frequently asked questions

What is ideal body weight?
Ideal body weight is a number computed from height and sex rather than a measured target. Devine, Robinson and Miller each define it differently, and at adult heights they disagree by one or two kilograms. The formulas exist because drug doses are often scaled to body size and a bedside measurement of body composition is not available.
Why do the Robinson formula and the Miller formula give different numbers?
They regress different data. Robinson fits the combined frame sizes of the 1959 Metropolitan Life tables; Miller fits later Metropolitan Life tables and comes out with a higher base weight and a shallower slope. Neither is more correct — they summarize slightly different populations, and both are averages, not recommendations.
Which ideal body weight formula do doctors use?
Devine, by a wide margin, and it is the one this calculator shows first. It is also the simplest of the three: 50.0 kg plus 2.3 kg for every inch over five feet for men, 45.5 kg plus the same 2.3 kg per inch for women. Because both sexes share the slope, women read exactly 4.5 kg lower at every height.
Does ideal body weight work for athletes and muscular people?
No. Every formula here uses height and sex only, so a heavily muscled adult is told to weigh the same as anyone else of that height. If you train seriously, a body fat measurement or the BMI healthy weight range will describe you better than an ideal weight formula does.
Is the healthy weight range the same thing as ideal body weight?
No, and the difference matters. The healthy weight range is the interval that keeps you inside the normal BMI band at your height — a range built from population risk, which is why it is what public health guidance publishes. An ideal body weight is a single number from a dosing formula. When the two disagree, the range is the one to read as health advice.
What happens below 152.4 cm, where the formulas were not fitted?
The three formulas are anchored on five feet, which is also the shortest height they were fitted over, so below it they extrapolate. The calculator accepts heights down to 120 cm but holds the five-foot value all the way: a 140 cm man reads exactly the numbers a 152.4 cm man reads — 50.0, 52.0 and 56.2 kg — instead of values that carry on falling. That is a stop, not a correction. Left to extrapolate, Devine would hand a 140 cm woman 34.3 kg, below the 36.3 kg that BMI 18.5 marks as underweight at her height, so her ideal weight would land inside the underweight band. Below five feet, BMI or a body-fat measurement is the better guide.

References

Related calculators